[A Case of Adenocarcinoma of Pancreatic Head of Liver Disfunction after Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Celiac Artery Stenosis Treated by Urgent Median Arcuate Ligament Release].

This patient visited our hospital for the purpose of detailed examination of prostate cancer in his seventies. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography(CT)revealed a low-density mass of 2 cm in the pancreatic head. He was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed after 2 courses of gemcitabine and S-1 therapy were performed as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. An intraoperative clamp test of the gastroduodenal artery showed that the pulsation of the common hepatic artery and the proper hepatic artery was weak but sufficient, so the gastroduodenal artery was cut and the operation was completed as planned. A blood test on the 1st day after the operation showed elevated levels of AST 537 U/L, ALT 616 U/L, and 7 hours later blood sampling showed further increases in AST 1,455 U/L, ALT 1,314 U/L. After a detailed review of the preoperative CT, celiac artery stenosis due to compression of the arcuate ligament was suspected, and urgent median arcuate ligament release was performed on the same day. Dissection of the arcuate ligament significantly improved the pulsation of the common hepatic artery and proper hepatic artery. Postoperatively, hepatic enzymes improved and ISGPS showed Grade B pancreatic juice leakage, but the patient was discharged from the hospital on the 49th postoperative day without any other complications. He took S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy, and no signs of recurrence have been observed 9 months after the operation.

Biweekly oxaliplatin plus S1 for Chinese elderly patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer as the first-line therapy: a single-arm, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: SOX (oxaliplatin and S1, every 3 weeks) is one of the most common first-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic G/GEJ (gastric or gastroesophageal junction) cancer in Asia, but it has noticeable hematological and neurological toxicity. In China, the majority of gastric cancer patients are middle-aged and elderly with poor tolerance to 3-weekly chemotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to assess efficacy and safety of biweekly SOX for Chinese advanced G/GEJ cancer patients aged ≥ 60 years as the first-line treatment in a single arm phase 2 study. METHODS: Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously on day 1 at 85 mg/m2. S-1 was given at 80, 100 or 120 mg/day, depending on the body surface area (< 1.25 m2, 1.25 to < 1.5 m2, or ≥ 1.5 m2), twice daily, on day 1-10, every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR) and safety. RESULTS: Between May 2016 and Sep 2018, 42 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 43.6 months. The ORR and DCR were 52.4% and 85.7%, respectively. The median PFS was 4.6 months (95%CI 2.486-6.714), and the median OS was 11.1 months (95%CI 8.001-14.199). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade included thrombocytopenia (59.5%), neutropenia (57.1%), appetite loss (57.1%) and nausea (54.8%). Only two patients suffered from grade 3 TRAEs (4.8%), including neutropenia (1 patient, [2.4%]) and diarrhea (1 patient, [2.4%]). No ≥ grade 4 TRAEs occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Biweekly SOX seemed to have favorable tolerance without compromising the efficacy as the first-line therapy in Chinese elderly patients aged ≥ 60 years with advanced G/GEJ cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04694404 (5/1/2021). This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, (17-048/1303).

Prospective observational study of the efficacy of oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin for stage II colon cancer with risk factors for recurrence using propensity score matching (JFMC46-1201).

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colon cancer (CC) has not been well established. We compared the effects of surgery with and without oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin (UFT/LV) in patients with high-risk stage II CC, adjusting for potential risk factors. METHODS: We enrolled patients with histologically confirmed stage II colon adenocarcinoma with at least one of the following conditions: T4 disease, perforation/penetration, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma/mucinous carcinoma, or < 12 dissected lymph nodes. Patients chose to be non-randomized or randomized to undergo surgery alone (NR-Group S or R-Group S) or surgery followed by 6 months of UFT/LV (NR-Group U or R-Group U). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) after adjusting for previously reported risk factors using propensity score matching (1:2) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) in the non-randomized arm. RESULTS: Overall, 1,902 (98%) and 36 (2%) patients were enrolled in the non-randomized and randomized arms, respectively. There were too few patients in the randomized arm and these were therefore excluded from the analysis. Of the 1,902 patients, 402 in NR-Group S and 804 in NR-Group U were propensity score-matched. The 3-year DFS rate (95% confidence interval) was significantly higher in NR-Group U (80.9% [77.9%-83.4%]) than in NR-Group S (74.0% [69.3%-78.0%]) (hazard ratio, 0.64 [0.50-0.83]; P = 0.0006). The 3-year overall survival rate was not significantly different between NR-Group S and NR-Group U. Significantly higher 3-year DFS (P = 0.0013) and overall survival (P = 0.0315) rates were observed in NR-Group U compared with NR-Group S using IPTW. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT/LV showed a significant survival benefit over surgery alone in patients with high-risk stage II CC characterized by at least one of the following conditions: T4 disease, perforation/penetration, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma/mucinous carcinoma, or < 12 dissected lymph nodes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCTs031180155 (date of registration: 25/02/2019) (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000007783 , date of registration: 18/04/2012).

The clinical outcomes of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: an exploratory analysis of JCOG1113.

In the FUGA-BT trial (JCOG1113), gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) showed non-inferiority to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) in overall survival (OS) with good tolerance for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). We performed a subgroup analysis focused on the elderly cohort of this trial. All 354 enrolled patients in JCOG1113 were classify into two groups; < 75 (non-elderly) and ≥ 75 years (elderly) group. We investigated the influence of age on the safety analysis, including the incidence of chemotherapeutic adverse events and the efficacy analysis, including OS. There were no remarkable differences in OS between the elderly (n = 60) and the non-elderly groups (n = 294). In the elderly group, median OS was 12.7 and 17.7 months for those who received GC (n = 20) and GS (n = 40), respectively. The prevalence of all-grade adverse events was similar between the elderly and the non-elderly groups. However, among the elderly group, Grade ≥ 3 hematological adverse events were more frequently observed in the GC arm than in the GS arm. The clinical outcomes of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced BTC were comparable to non-elderly patients. GS may be the more favorable treatment for elderly patients with advanced BTC.

Addition of sintilimab to nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel and S-1 as adjuvant therapy in stage IIIC gastric cancer.

The prognosis of stage III gastric cancer (GC) is not satisfying and the specific chemotherapy regimens for GC of stage IIIC based on the 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC TNM staging system are still inconclusive. Peritoneal recurrence is the common and severe relapse pattern. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (Nab-PTX) is safer and more effective than PTX in the peritoneal metastasis. Clinical trial has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of sintilimab in GC. A combination of Nab-PTX, S-1 and sintilimab could be a promising triplet regimen as adjuvant therapy for GC. The aim of this article is to describe the design of this prospective Dragon-VII trial, conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of Nab-PTX, S-1 and sintilimab. Clinical trial registration: NCT04781413.

Lay abstract The prognosis of stage IIIC gastric cancer is poor and the treatment for it is not satisfying. This is a clinical trial that aims to explore a more effective therapy in gastric cancer patients of stage IIIC. Patients with stage IIIC gastric cancer must meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria to be eligible for this trial. The eligible patients will be given eight cycles of combinatory therapy of albumin-bound paclitaxel, a chemotherapy (day 1 and day 8), and S-1, another chemotherapy (days 1 to 14), plus sintilimab, a type of immunotherapy called an immune checkpoint inhibitor (day 1) every 3 weeks and then sintilimab maintenance for up to 12 months.

Pathological complete response at the para-aortic nodes as a possible surrogate endpoint in gastric cancer surgery with para-aortic node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Gastric cancer with para-aortic node (PAN) metastasis has a chance to be cured with multidisciplinary treatment of D2 and PAN dissection (PAND) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), but its prognosis remains unsatisfactory. To establish a better multidisciplinary treatment, a better surrogate endpoint is needed. The present study focused on a pathological complete response at the PANs alone as a new surrogate endpoint and evaluated its prognostic value. METHODS: The study examined patients who received radical gastrectomy with D2 and PAND after NAC for gastric cancer with PAN metastasis from 2004 to 2015. The study compared five methods of evaluating the response to NAC: RECIST, clinical disappearance of PANs (cPAN), histological response of the primary tumor defined by Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (JCGC histological criteria) and Becker's criteria, and pathological disappearance of PANs (pPAN). The efficacy of these methods was compared using the hazard ratio (HR) for death between responders and non-responders. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were analyzed. The respective HR and 5-year overall survival rates of responders and non-responders were 1.316 and 49.1% vs. 60.0% by RECIST, 1.106 and 52.9% vs. 52.5% by cPAN, 0.246 and 71.3% vs. 28.6% by JCGC histological criteria, 0.239 and 76.2% vs. 36.8% by Becker's criteria, and 0.074 and 81.0% vs. 0.0% by pPAN. CONCLUSIONS: A pathological complete response at the PANs had the lowest HR and clearly differentiated the survival, suggesting it might be a good surrogate endpoint for identifying future candidates for NAC in multidisciplinary treatment for gastric cancer with PAN metastasis.

Oxaliplatin plus S-1 with intraperitoneal paclitaxel for the treatment of Chinese advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we tried to access the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus S-1 with intraperitoneal paclitaxel (PTX) for the treatment of Chinese advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer underwent laparoscopic exploration and were enrolled when macroscopic disseminated metastases (P1) were confirmed. PTX was diluted in 1 l of normal saline and IP administered through peritoneal port at an initial dose of 40 mg/m2 over 1 h on day1,8, respectively. Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously at an initial dose of 100 mg/m2 on day1, and S-1 was administered orally at an initial dose of 80 mg/m2 for 14 days followed by 7 days rest, repeated by every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Of all these 30 patients, the median number of cycles was 6 (range 2-16) due to the limitation of hematotoxicity and peripheral neuropathy by oxaliplatin. There were 11 (36.7%) patients received conversion surgery. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.6 months (95% CI = 4.7-8.5 months) and the median overall survival (OS) was 15.1 months (95% CI = 12.4-17.8 months). The grade 3-4 hematological toxicities were leucopenia (23.3%), neutropenia (23.3%), anemia (16.7%), and thrombocytopenia (20%), respectively. The grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicities were tolerated, most of which were peripheral sensory neuropathy (40%) due to oxaliplatin, diarrhea (20%), nausea and vomiting (26.7%). CONCLUSIONS: SOX+ip PTX regimen was effective in advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Survival time was significantly prolonged by conversion surgery. Grade 3-4 toxicities were uncommon. Large scale clinical trial is necessary to get more evidence to identify its efficacy. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR, ChiCTR-IIR-16009802 . Registered 9 November 2016.

A phase II study of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/S-1 combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial contact.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial contact (BRPC-A) is extremely poor, and effective preoperative treatment is indispensable. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel and S-1 (GAS), for patients with BRPC-A. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentre, single-arm, phase II study was performed. Patients were administered 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine on day 1, 125 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel on day 1 and 60-100 mg/day S-1 on days 1-7 during a 14-day cycle. Patients were then assessed for resectability and response to treatment after six cycles. The primary end-points were 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and median OS time (trial registration: jRCTs061180045, UMIN000016630). RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with BRPC-A were eligible for the present study. Six courses of neoadjuvant GAS regimen were completed in all eligible patients. The rate of grade III/IV toxicities occurred in 14 (30%) patients during the neoadjuvant GAS regimen. The response and disease control rates were 43% and 96%, respectively. Forty-five (96%) patients received potentially curative pancreatectomy, whereas two did not owing to disease progression. R0 resection was performed in 40 (86%) of 47 eligible patients. Eleven (24%) patients experienced postoperative major complications (>grade III), including one mortality. The 2-year OS rate and median OS time among 47 eligible patients were 70.1% and 41.0 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The neoadjuvant GAS chemotherapy regimen for BRPC-A showed good efficacy with mild toxicity, resulting in a high R0 resection rate and prolonged survival in patients with BRPC-A.

The efficiency of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) remains a major problem after curative resection of primary rectal cancer. A noninvasive, prognostic biomarker with which to accurately evaluate disease status and assess the treatment response is critically needed to optimize treatment plans. This study assesses the effectiveness of PET/CT evaluation of preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with LRRC. METHODS: Since 2004, we have been performing preoperative CRT to improve local tumor control and survival. Between 2004 and 2013, 40 patients with LRRC underwent preoperative CRT (radiation: 50 Gy/25 fractions; chemotherapy: irinotecan plus UFT [tegafur and uracil]/leucovorin) and radical surgery, and underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT before and 3 weeks after the completion of CRT. The maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of the pre-CRT scan (Pre-SUV) and the post-CRT scan (Post-SUV) were measured. The predictive value of the 18F-FDG-PET and CT/MRI response assessments was evaluated. RESULTS: The mean Pre-SUV was significantly higher than the Post-SUV (8.2 ± 6.1, vs. 3.8 ± 4.0; P < 0.0001). Following CRT, 17/40 patients (42.5%) were classified as responders according to the Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG1-2). The mean Post-SUV was significantly lower in responders than in nonresponders (2.0 ± 1.7 vs. 5.1 ± 3.9; P = 0.0038). Pathological response was not correlated with the response as evaluated by CT (P > 0.9999) or MRI (P > 0.9999). Multivariate regression analysis identified Post-SUV as an independent predictor of local re-recurrence-free survival (P = 0.0383) and for overall survival (P = 0.0195). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT is useful in assessing tumor response to preoperative CRT for LRRC and predicting prognosis after surgery.

Phase II feasibility study of adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 followed by S-1 for stage III gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) following S-1 therapy in patients with stage III gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy. METHODS: Patients with stage III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy were enrolled. Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated within 8 weeks of gastrectomy. The first cycle of chemotherapy consisted of S-1 monotherapy (day 1-14), followed by a 7-day rest period. Cycles 2 and 3 consisted of the following: S-1 (day 1-14) administration, followed by a 14-day rest period, and an intravenous infusion of cisplatin and docetaxel on days 1 and 15. After two cycles, S-1 was administered for up to 1 year. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled between 2014 and 2017. Febrile neutropenia of grade 3 or higher was the most common hematological toxicity with 4 patients (13.3%). Other hematological toxicities of grade 3 or higher were as follows: neutropenia in 3 (10.0%), leukopenia in 3 (10.0%), and anemia in 2 (6.7%) patients. Most frequent non-hematological toxicity of grade 3 was anorexia (n = 4, 13.3%) and general fatigue (n = 3, 10.0%); no grade 4 non-hematological toxicities were observed. Twenty-five patients (83.3%) completed two cycles of DCS treatment and 18 (60.0%) completed subsequent S-1 treatment for 1 year. The relative dose intensity of docetaxel and cisplatin was 0.86 and that of S-1 was 0.88. CONCLUSION: The DCS regimen can be acceptable as an adjuvant chemotherapy and offers an effective postoperative treatment option for stage III gastric cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000012785 . DATE OF REGISTRY: 08/01/2014.

Efficacy of paclitaxel and S-1 combined with apatinib in the conversion therapy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: To explore the safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel and tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil potassium (S-1) combined with apatinib in the conversion therapy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 66 patients with advanced gastric cancer received treatment with paclitaxel + S-1 + apatinib. Patients evaluated as resectable advanced gastric cancer by the multiple disciplinary team (MDT) underwent the surgery. The clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of the patients receiving conversion therapy and the related indicators of those undergoing operation were recorded. Later, the survival of the patients was compared between successful conversion therapy (surgery) group and unsuccessful conversion therapy (non-surgery) group. RESULTS: All the 66 patients completed 3-7 cycles of chemotherapy, with a median of 5 cycles, and the objective response rate (ORR) after conversion therapy was 71.2% (47/66). Among them, 48 patients received operation for (225.2±37.3) min on average, with the intraoperative blood loss of (168.2±40.9) mL and (50.9±12.3) intraoperative dissected lymph nodes, including 34 (70.8%) cases of R0 resection. According to the postoperative pathological tumor regression grading (TRG), there were 2 (4.2%) TRG 0 cases, 10 (20.8%) TRG 1 cases, 28 (58.3%) TRG 2 cases and 8 (16.7%) TRG 3 cases. The follow-up results revealed that the one-year overall survival (OS) of the patients was 93.8% (45/48) in successful conversion therapy (surgery) group and 61.1% (11/18) in unsuccessful conversion therapy (non-surgery) group. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel and S-1 combined with apatinib can achieve a higher R0 resection rate, and improve the survival rate of patients with successful conversion therapy, showing high safety and efficacy.

Anthracycline-containing regimens or taxane versus S-1 as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated S-1 is non-inferior to taxane with respect to overall survival as first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. We aimed to confirm whether S-1 is also non-inferior to anthracycline-containing regimens in the same setting. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, non-inferiority, Phase 3 study. Individuals who had HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, had received no chemotherapy for advanced disease and had endocrine therapy resistance, were randomly assigned to the anthracycline-containing regimens or S-1. The primary endpoint was overall survival. A pre-planned combined analysis of our two Phase 3 studies was also carried out. RESULTS: We enrolled 230 patients (anthracycline, n = 115; S-1, n = 115). Median overall survival was 30.1 months (95% CI 24.9-35.8) with the S-1 group and 33.7 months (95% CI 25.5-36.9) with the anthracycline group. The HR for the anthracycline group was 1.09 (95% CI 0.80-1.48). The combined analysis constituted 814 patients (395 assigned to standard treatment (anthracycline or taxane); 419 assigned to S-1). Median overall survival was 36.3 months in the standard treatment group and 32.7 months in the S-1 group. S-1 was non-inferior to standard treatment in terms of overall survival (HR 1.06 (95% CI 0.90-1.25); P non-inferiority = 0.0062). CONCLUSIONS: S-1 could be considered a new treatment option for first-line chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The University Hospital Medical Information Network, Japan: UMIN000005449. This trial was registered on 15 April, 2011.

HER2-Directed Therapy in Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Triumphs and Troubles.

OPINION STATEMENT: Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers represent the third leading cause of malignancy-associated death worldwide. Approximately 15-20% of these adenocarcinomas overexpress the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), a pro-proliferative receptor tyrosine kinase that has been therapeutically exploited in other disease contexts. The landmark ToGA trial demonstrated that trastuzumab, an anti-HER2 antibody, could improve overall survival for patients with HER2 overexpressing advanced gastric and GEJ adenocarcinomas. In the ensuing decade, great effort has been made to refine and expand this therapeutic strategy through a variety of avenues including optimization of chemotherapy backbones, identifying potential synergy with immune checkpoint inhibition, deployment of alternative HER2-targeted antibodies, use of small molecule inhibitors, and development of HER2-directed antibody drug conjugates. While the results of these efforts have had variable success, they have led to a greater understanding of the mechanisms of both primary and acquired resistance to HER2-directed therapies, laying the groundwork for future investigations. Recently, KEYNOTE-811 and DESTINY-Gastric01 have led to the FDA approvals of pembrolizumab in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy in the 1st-line advanced setting and trastuzumab deruxtecan (fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki) in the 2nd-line setting, respectively. Herein, we review these significant works as well as discuss the ongoing investigations they have inspired, which aim to find and utilize additional means for targeting HER2 in gastric and GEJ cancers.

Randomized phase II study of SOX+B-mab versus SOX+C-mab in patients with previously untreated recurrent advanced colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS (MCSGO-1107 study).

BACKGROUND: Although chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved, the standard chemotherapy regimens for patients with RAS wild-type mCRC remain debated. This study aimed to compare S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) + bevacizumab (B-mab) with SOX + cetuximab (C-mab) in patients with previously untreated recurrent advanced CRC with wild-type KRAS. METHODS: This randomized phase II, open-label, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of SOX+B-mab with SOX+C-mab in patients with previously untreated advanced CRC with wild-type KRAS. Between February 2012 and October 2016, 45 patients were enrolled. RESULTS: Overall response rates were 59.1 and 43.5% (p = 0.29) and disease control rates were 90.9 and 91.3% (p = 0.96) in the SOX+B-mab and SOX+C-mab groups, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 25.3 and 15.5 months (HR = 0.607, p = 0.167) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.7 and 5.5 months (HR = 0.558, p = 0.077) in the SOX+B-mab and SOX+C-mab groups, respectively. The OS and PFS of patients with early tumor shrinkage (ETS) were not significantly different in the SOX+B-mab group. However, they were significantly better when ETS was ≥20 in the SOX+C-mab group (p = 0.032 and p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of SOX+B-mab and SOX+C-mab for wild-type KRAS recurrent advanced CRC as first-line chemotherapy were almost the same. Consideration of the treatment strategy based on ETS may improve patient prognosis, especially in patients receiving the SOX+C-mab regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ( UMIN000006706 ). Date of registration: NOV/11/2011. URL of trial registry record: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000007920.

Neoadjuvant Intraperitoneal and Systemic Chemotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and S-1 for Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) remains debatable. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS) versus neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NSC) for GCPM. METHODS: Patients of GCPM received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1 between January 2011 and June 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was carried out to reduce the selection bias. Multivariate Cox regression model was applied to screen the prognostic factors. RESULTS: After PSM processing, 71 patients in each group were matched among the 186 GCPM patients included. NIPS yielded a better ascites and cytology response to chemotherapy, higher conversion resection rate and R0 resection rate than NSC. The overall survival (OS) rate in NIPS group was better than that in NSC group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the P stage, ascites response, conversion surgery rate and R0 resection rate were independent prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis indicated that NIPS showed a survival benefit over NSC only in patients with cT3-4a, P1-2, whose cytology turned negative, and who received conversion surgery; while not in patients with cT4b, P0 or P3, whose cytology did not turn negative, or who did not receive conversion surgery. CONCLUSIONS: NIPS is a safe and feasible treatment for GCPM, which showed more benefit than NSC.

Comparison of S-1-based vs. capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: S-1-based and capecitabine-based adjuvant treatments are proved efficacious for patients with gastric cancer, but conventional meta-analyses of the direct comparisons between two alternative adjuvant regimens to resection of GC have not been attempted. AIM: The aim of this review was to compare the disease-free survival, overall survival and adverse events in patients receiving the S-1- and capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapies for treatment of gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing resection. METHODS: A search of the academic literature was performed in PUBMED, SCOPUS, CENTRAL and EMBASE databases along with manual search in relevant journals for studies in English, to identify comparative studies comparing the effect of S-1-based chemotherapy and capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), used in combination with surgical resection for treatment of gastric cancer. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses was carried out for all the included studies. The hazard ratios (HR) of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were pooled using generic inverse variance method. The included studies were assessed for risk of bias using ROBINS-E (risk of bias in non-randomized studies of exposures) tool. RESULTS: Seven retrospective cohort studies, two prospective cohort studies and one randomized clinical trial were included. Both S-1- and capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of stage 2 or 3 gastric cancer had similar effects on the 3-year and 5-year DFS rates, overall survival and adverse events in the included studies. There was no difference in the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of OS and DFS (0.86 95% CI (0.68, 1.09); p = 0.21 and 0.96 95% CI (0.75, 1.24), respectively). Oral mucositis was increasingly associated with S-1-based AC, while incidences of adverse events such as neutropenia, anaemia and thrombocytopenia were similar to those of capecitabine-based regimen. The quality of the included studies was found to be low to moderate. CONCLUSION: S-1- and capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapies can be used interchangeably as an adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen postradical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection.

Efficacy of apatinib combined with tegafur gimeracil and oteracil potassium in the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium (S-1) in the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 126 patients with advanced gastric cancer admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to September 2018 were enrolled as the research objects, none of whom underwent surgery. For these patients, second-line treatment was recommended due to the failure of first-line treatment. According to the different therapeutic options, patients were categorized into S-1 group (n=63) and Apatinib group (S-1 combined with apatinib, n=63), and drugs were administered orally. The clinical efficacy, serological indicators, adverse reactions and immune function were compared between the two groups. Besides, the survival status of patients was recorded through follow-up. RESULTS: In S-1 group and Apatinib group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 30.2% (19/63) vs. 50.8% (32/63) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 54.0% (34/63) vs. 74.6% (47/63), respectively. The results indicated that Apatinib group was superior to S-1 group in terms of ORR and DCR, suggesting statistically significant differences (p=0.018, p=0.016). Compared with those before treatment, the serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and tumor supplied group of factors (TSGF) in the two groups of patients were prominently reduced after treatment (p<0.05). After treatment, CA19-9 and TSGF levels were remarkably lower in Apatinib group than those in S-1 group (p=0.008, p=0.023), and there was no statistically significant difference in the CEA level between the two groups (p=0.057). After treatment, the quality of life of patients was improved notably in Apatinib group compared with that in S-1 group (p=0.002). Adverse reactions mainly involved hematological toxicity, nausea and vomiting, abnormal renal function, impairment of hepatic function, neurotoxicity, hypertension and hand-foot syndrome, most of which were in grade I-II and relieved after symptomatic treatment and could be tolerated for continued treatment. Serious adverse reactions in grade III-IV occurred rarely. No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence rate of adverse reactions between the two groups of patients (p>0.05). Besides, according to the follow-up results, median overall survival (OS) was 8.1 months vs. 10.7 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months vs. 5.3 months, respectively, in S-1 group and Apatinib group. The results of log-rank test demonstrated that Apatinib group was superior to S-1 group with respect to OS, showing a statistically significant difference (p=0.028), and no statistically significant difference was found in PFS between the two groups of patients (p=0.159). CONCLUSION: In the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, apatinib combined with S-1 is superior to S-1 alone in term of clinical efficacy, and its adverse reactions can be tolerated. Apatinib combined with S-1 can prominently improve the quality of life, reduce the serum tumor marker levels and prolong the OS of patients, but it cannot extend the PFS.

Combination therapy of bevacizumab with either S-1 and irinotecan or mFOLFOX6/CapeOX as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (TRICOLORE): Exploratory analysis of RAS status and primary tumour location in a randomised, open-label, phase III, non-inferiority trial.

AIM: The TRICOLORE trial previously demonstrated that S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab was non-inferior, based on progression-free survival (PFS), to 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6)/capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOX) plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Overall survival (OS) data were immature at the time of the primary analysis. METHODS: In total, 487 patients from 53 institutions with previously untreated mCRC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either mFOLFOX6/CapeOX plus bevacizumab (control group) or S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (experimental group; 3- or 4-week regimen). The final OS data were analysed from follow-up data collected until 30th September 2017. RESULTS: With a median follow-up period of 48.7 months, median survival times were 32.6 and 34.3 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-1.10, P = 0.293) and median PFS durations were 10.8 and 14.0 months in the control and experimental groups, respectively (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.71-1.04, P < 0.0001 for non-inferiority). In patients with left-sided RAS wild-type tumours, median PFS durations were 11.4 and 16.9 months in the control and experimental groups, respectively (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48-0.96, P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab resulted in comparable OS and non-inferior PFS with that of mFOLFOX6/CapeOX plus bevacizumab treatment as first-line chemotherapy for patients with mCRC. We recommend the use of S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab as a standard first-line regimen independent of tumour sidedness or RAS status in mCRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR: 000007834.

Oral tegafur-uracil as a metronomic therapy in stage IVa and IVb cancer of the oral cavity.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of accumulated oral tegafur-uracil (UFUR) as maintenance chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates after definitive treatment for non-distant metastatic stage IV cancer of the oral cavity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, hospital center-based study analyzed data of patients diagnosed with stage IVa and IVb cancer of the oral cavity who underwent surgical resection and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) obtained from a database between October 2008 and December 2014. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were treated with CCRT (non-UFUR group); the remaining 51 patients received the same regimen, followed by additional oral UFUR (UFUR group). For all study patients, the 3-year DFS rates were 53.05% and 35.41% in the UFUR and non-UFUR groups, respectively (p = 0.011), while the 3-year OS rates were 74.96% and 48.47%, respectively (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adding UFUR to CCRT significantly improved the DFS and OS rates in patients with non-distant metastatic stage IV cancer of the oral cavity.

Perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy (RESOLVE): an open-label, superiority and non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal perioperative chemotherapeutic regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer remains undefined. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of perioperative and postoperative S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) compared with postoperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapOx) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergoing D2 gastrectomy. METHODS: We did this open-label, phase 3, superiority and non-inferiority, randomised trial at 27 hospitals in China. We recruited antitumour treatment-naive patients aged 18 years or older with historically confirmed cT4a N+ M0 or cT4b Nany M0 gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, with Karnofsky performance score of 70 or more. Patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) via an interactive web response system, stratified by participating centres and Lauren classification, to receive adjuvant CapOx (eight postoperative cycles of intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day one of each 21 day cycle plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day), adjuvant SOX (eight postoperative cycles of intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day one of each 21 day cycle plus oral S-1 40-60 mg twice a day), or perioperative SOX (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day one of each 21 day plus oral S-1 40-60 mg twice a day for three cycles preoperatively and five cycles postoperatively followed by three cycles of S-1 monotherapy). The primary endpoint, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, 3-year disease-free survival to assess the superiority of perioperative-SOX compared with adjuvant-SOX and the non-inferiority (hazard ratio non-inferiority margin of 1·33) of adjuvant-SOX compared with adjuvant-CapOx. Safety analysis were done in patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01534546. FINDINGS: Between Aug 15, 2012, and Feb 28, 2017, 1094 patients were screened and 1022 (93%) were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, of whom 345 (34%) patients were assigned to the adjuvant-CapOx, 340 (33%) patients to the adjuvant-SOX group, and 337 (33%) patients to the perioperative-SOX group. 3-year disease-free survival was 51·1% (95% CI 45·5-56·3) in the adjuvant-CapOx group, 56·5% (51·0-61·7) in the adjuvant-SOX group, and 59·4% (53·8-64·6) in the perioperative-SOX group. The hazard ratio (HR) was 0·77 (95% CI 0·61-0·97; Wald p=0·028) for the perioperative-SOX group compared with the adjuvant-CapOx group and 0·86 (0·68-1·07; Wald p=0·17) for the adjuvant-SOX group compared with the adjuvant-CapOx group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events was neutropenia (32 [12%] of 258 patients in the adjuvant-CapOx group, 21 [8%] of 249 patients in the adjuvant-SOX group, and 30 [10%] of 310 patients in the perioperative-SOX group). Serious adverse events were reported in seven (3%) of 258 patients in adjuvant-CapOx group, two of which were related to treatment; eight (3%) of 249 patients in adjuvant-SOX group, two of which were related to treatment; and seven (2%) of 310 patients in perioperative-SOX group, four of which were related to treatment. No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Perioperative-SOX showed a clinically meaningful improvement compared with adjuvant-CapOx in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who had D2 gastrectomy; adjuvant-SOX was non-inferior to adjuvant-CapOx in these patients. Perioperative-SOX could be considered a new treatment option for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. FUNDING: National Key Research and Development Program of China, Beijing Scholars Program 2018-2024, Peking University Clinical Scientist Program, Taiho, Sanofi-Aventis, and Hengrui Pharmaceutical. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.